Les Ebdon confirmed as new head of OFFA

20 Feb 2012

 So the government has seen sense (or more likely in the world of realpolitik David Cameron did a compromise deal with Vince Cable) and has allowed the appointment of Professor Les Ebdon as the new head of OFFA to go ahead.

Offa has this morning confirmed his appointment. The outgoing head, Sir Martin Harris, said of his successor, who will take over later this year: “I am confident that all universities will find that he takes a fair, balanced and considered approach to the very difficult issues of fair access and widening participation, helping them continue to work with schools to raise aspirations and standards.”

In a letter to the Select Committee, the Business Secretary, Vince Cable, said its report did 'not raise any new, relevant facts about Professor Ebdon's suitability for the post'. However, he did say he took 'seriously' the committee's concerns over his presentational skills, and noted the Professor Ebdon himself 'felt he could perhaps have performed more effectively'.  Professor Ebdon has agreed to return to the committee for further monitoring sessions.

The whole kerfuffle over his appointment has been bizarre and has led to some  over-heated journalism and media commentary. The Daily Telegraph, for example, has been banging on about how Professor Ebdon has ignored the fact that the biggest obstacle to broadening university admissions is the performance of schools. But they are missing the much more obvious point which is that OFFA has no power to tell schools how or what to teach. Its remit is with universities. 

His critics say he is determined to force universities to take lower qualified students as part of a social engineering agenda and to compensate for poor schooling. Yet his supposed willingness to press the 'nuclear' button with universities was an unfair extrapolation of an answer to the Select Committee members who attempted to block his appointment. Asked if he would be willing to use the  powers that OFFA already has, Professor Ebdon said he would use them, but only as a last resort. What else could he sensibly say? If a regulator says it will never use its powers, who will listen to it? It did not mean he was itching to press the trigger, anymore than anyone  with their finger on a real nuclear button would wish to do so.

The crucial point about fair admissions is that previous experience (type of school, family background etc) should be taken into consideration when assessing a student's potential at university. No advocate of fair admissions is saying that less bright students should be taken just because of the background. But sometimes -  just as when a student has been ill or has suffered a family tragedy - there may be grounds for saying the applicant is better than their exam results would suggest. It is in the university's own interest to take that into account if they want to get the best performing undergraduates. Any employer would assess a candidate in the round and take the one they think who do the job the best. That may not always be the one with the best exam results. After all, no university would ever want to admit a student who would not cope with the academic pressures of a course.

Anyway, now this silliness is over, let's hope OFFA can get on and do the job it was intended to do, which is ensuring that the ables students (in terms of of both results and potential) are able to achieve their potential. And maybe some of the columnists who have seethed about this will take the time to read what Les Ebdon actually said on the issue rather than believing he had 'threatened' nuclear penalties. He may not have given the best performance at the Select Committee but that was because he appeared bemused by the the line of questioning from a few Tory MPs who were more concerned to make a political point about school performance than to ask him what he thought Offa should do.

The affair raises one other important point: the Business Innovation & Skills Committee - which monitors higher education policy - has a very wide remit that goes well beyond universities. As such, its membership has a greater expertise in business matters than in education, unlike - for example - the Commons Education committee that oversees policy on schools.

User Comments

Mike Ratcliffe - 20 Feb 2012

Understanding the OFFA

Thanks for posting some sense on this. I've been fascinated by the approach that people have taken to this issue. All the big hitters have been wheeled out to take cheap shots at Les, Bedfordshire University and, inevitably, media studies.

My disappointment remains in the way that no10 have drawn attention to a change in the 'progressive' repayment scheme, and linked this to the PM going along with this appointment.

Freda Tallantyre - 20 Feb 2012

Understanding widening participation

I hope the Select Committee wil be able to feel relieved that a person has been appointed who actually, with his experience at Bedfordshire, has a good chance of really understanding the issues surrounding widening participation and fair admissions.

Alastair - 20 Feb 2012

Sting in the tail?

The final paragraph (about whether the BIS select committe is the most appropriate to monitors HE or whether that's a job more suited to the Education select committee)suggests that part of what this "whole kefuffle" has been about brands of Conservative education thinking.

Is it appropriate for the certainties of the Gove-ian vision to extend beyond schools into colleges and universities (where already Alison Wolf's report - intended to be about 14-19 vocational education - is distorting the wider 19+ skills agenda) or whether the differently- nuanced Conservative vision of David Willetts (backed in coalition by Vince Cable), is more likely to be effective.

Rebecca Hanson - 20 Feb 2012

I'm worried the fuss is not over.

Thanks for this post Mike. Having read the Telegraph today I'm worried about this Tory group called FUAG which seems to contain the usual suspects who seem to be behind bucketloads of deeply ignorant and highly energetic policy which should never see the light of day.

At the heart of it seem to be a group of people with no experience whatsoever in education who have no mental map of the difference between an ordinary community comp and a sink school or between a middle class state school Oxbridge applicant who is little different from many of their private school peers and the genuinely working class Oxbridge applicant.

I've been working for many year on Oxbridge access and after all these years and despite all our efforts it is always the kids with at least one professional parent who get in to Oxbridge.

The kids with unemployed parents - or parents in low skilled jobs do who inevitabely do not have lots of extra-curricular activies or the confidence or speaking skills of their middle class contemporaries do not get in. Ever. We've tried so hard but the difference between the two groups of students at interview is colossal. We understand that they do not interview well but we think the Oxbridge tutors do not understand why that is and how rapidly it will dissolve if these students ever got the chance of the opportunities Oxbridge offers.

I think our top politicians could really do with mixing with such people at university too.

Deian - 02 Mar 2012

OFFA

As always,a wise and balanced report - and admirable commentaries by your correspondents. What has been most depressing about this whole episode, as you know Mike, is the undercurrent of prejudice against widening participation, new universities, non-traditional courses and new ways of teaching which has surfaced in the press and accompanying blogs. Les was the conduit. But even though we are all too familiar with this kind of prejudice, the venom and bile which poured out of some parts of the press was astonishing. Let's wish Les all the best as he confronts those who would do anything to stand in the way of progress. Meantime, those university leaders who may have briefed against Les should seriously reflect on their behaviour.

Post a comment

After posting your comment you will need to confirm it by checking your email and clicking the confirmation that will be sent to you.

Comments will appear once reviewed for appropriate content.